Kirkendoll v. Entertainment Acquisitions, L.L.C.
Plaintiff: Alan Kirkendoll
Defendant: Entertainment Acquisitions, L.L.C.
Case Number: 2:2019cv12854
Filed: September 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Dana Douglas
Referring Judge: Janis van Meerveld
2 Judge: Sarah S Vance
3 Judge: Wendy B Vitter
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: ORDERED that Unopposed Motion to Consolidate Cases (R. Doc. 26 in master case) is GRANTED and Civil Action No. 19-7942-WBV-JVM, Kirkendoll v. Entertainment Acquisitions, LLC and Civil Action No. 19-12854-WBV-JVM, Kirkendoll v. Entertainment Acquisitions, LLC, are CONSOLIDATED as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 10/10/2019.(jeg)
October 9, 2019 Filing 9 Affidavit of Service Returned Executed; Entertainment Acquisitions, L.L.C. served on 10/2/2019, answer due 10/23/2019. (Landry, Mark) Modified text on 10/10/2019 (clw).
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Case transferred to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. Judge Sarah S. Vance, Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 10/2/19. (NEF: District Judge, Magistrate Judge) (ko)
September 30, 2019 Filing 7 Notice of Related Case(s) civil action no. 19-07942 by Alan Kirkendoll. (Landry, Mark) Modified text on 9/30/2019 (mm).
September 30, 2019 Filing 6 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #3 Summons Submitted for Issuance. **Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of the summons. The pdf should not have the blue boxes nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action.** (mm)
September 30, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Entertainment Acquisitions, L.L.C. (mm)
September 30, 2019 Filing 4 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Sarah S. Vance and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (aj)
September 28, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Submitted for Issuance (Landry, Mark) (Main Document 3 replaced on 9/30/2019) (mm).
September 28, 2019 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet Submitted (Landry, Mark)
September 28, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Entertainment Acquisitions, L.L.C. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7877642) filed by Alan Kirkendoll. (Attachments: #1 Promissory Note)Attorney Mark Christopher Landry added to party Alan Kirkendoll(pty:pla).(Landry, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kirkendoll v. Entertainment Acquisitions, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alan Kirkendoll
Represented By: Mark Christopher Landry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Entertainment Acquisitions, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?