Brandsafway LLC v. Zen-Noh Grain Corporation
| Brandsafway LLC |
| Zen-Noh Grain Corporation |
| 2:2019cv13136 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Greg Gerard Guidry |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, as to Zen-Noh Grain Corporation answer due 1/6/2020. Signed by Judge Greg Gerard Guidry on 12/13/19. (ko)
|
| Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer. **Filing attorney should have linked filing to Document 1. Clerk properly linked document.** (mm) |
| Filing 3 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint by Zen-Noh Grain Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Attorney Brodie G. Glenn added to party Zen-Noh Grain Corporation(pty:dft).(Glenn, Brodie) Modified linkage on 12/12/2019 (mm). |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Greg Gerard Guidry and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7904341) filed by Brandsafway LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) Attorney Beau E. LeBlanc added to party Brandsafway LLC(pty:pla).(LeBlanc, Beau) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
