LeBlanc v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Plaintiff: Robert LeBlanc
Defendant: FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv13274
Filed: October 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Nannette Jolivette Brown
Referring Judge: Dana Douglas
2 Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2019 Filing 8 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Fedex Corporation for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (Parks, Charles)
December 6, 2019 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, #6 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc..Attorney Charles Michael Parks added to party FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.(pty:dft).(Parks, Charles) Modified text on 12/6/2019 (pp).
November 5, 2019 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. filed by Robert LeBlanc.(Braud, Charles)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - This Court has become aware of certain pleading deficiencies that must be resolved in order to determine if this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to amend the Complaint to expressly state the citizenship of Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to amend the Complaint within five (5) days, or if after amendment it is evident that there is not complete diversity among the parties, the Court will dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 11/1/2019.(sbs)
October 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on October 29, 2019.(mp)
October 28, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (jls)
October 25, 2019 Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (ess)
October 25, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (Prepayment of fee not required pursuant to 28 USC 1916) filed by Robert LeBlanc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Charles Arlen Braud, II added to party Robert LeBlanc(pty:pla).(Braud, Charles)
October 25, 2019 Filing fee paid from Robert LeBlanc re #1 Complaint, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7922110) (Braud, Charles)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LeBlanc v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J. O'Brien, Jr.
Represented By: Charles Michael Parks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert LeBlanc
Represented By: Charles Arlen Braud, II
Represented By: Steven Dewayne Jackson, Jr.
Represented By: Michelle O. Gallagher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?