In re: Craig Schwartzenberg
Plaintiff: Craig Schwartzenberg
Case Number: 2:2019cv13377
Filed: October 31, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Barry W Ashe
Referring Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 00 U.S.C. ยง 0000
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2019 Filing 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without prejudice by Craig Schwartzenberg (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(clw)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER DENYING #1 Motion to Seal Case. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 11/01/2019. (am)
October 31, 2019 Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Craig Schwartzenberg. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby.(am) Modified text on 11/5/2019 (am).
October 31, 2019 Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Craig Schwartzenberg. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(am)
October 31, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION to Seal Case by Craig Schwartzenberg. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Submission)(am)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re: Craig Schwartzenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig Schwartzenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?