Evans v. Petro Guardian, LLC
Blake Evans |
Petro Guardian, LLC |
2:2019cv13513 |
November 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Lance M Africk |
Dana Douglas |
Michael North |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint as to Petro Guardian, LLC. Answer due no later than 1/14/2020. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on January 2, 2020. (mp) |
Filing 6 EXPARTE/CONSENT Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint by Petro Guardian, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney David M. Korn added to party Petro Guardian, LLC(pty:dft).(Korn, David) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael North. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas on 11/15/19.(ko) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Petro Guardian, LLC. (blg) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (cc) |
Filing 2 Request of Summons Issued as to Petro Guardian, LLC filed by Blake Evans re #1 Complaint. (Alsterberg, Justin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Petro Guardian, LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-7944115) filed by Blake Evans. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Justin E. Alsterberg added to party Blake Evans(pty:pla).(Alsterberg, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.