Nelson v. Vannoy et al
Leonard Nelson |
Darryl Vannoy |
Attorney General State of Louisiana |
2:2019cv13752 |
November 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Martin LC Feldman |
Karen Wells Roby |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court terminate the deficiency assigned to the #1 petition and the #3 pauper application. IT IS ORDERED that the #3 Motion to Proceed as a Pauper is DENIED because the petitioner has sufficient funds to pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on January 7, 2020.(mp) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe DOCUMENT: re #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 12/16/2019. (clw) |
Filing 3 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Leonard Nelson. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (clw) Modified on 1/8/2020 to remove deficiency per Rec. Doc. 5 (mp). |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 12/13/2019. (clw) |
Filing 1 **DEFICIENT** PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Leonard Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(clw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.