Smith-Jordan v. Love, et al
| tamiko smith-jordan |
| Domino's Pizza, LLC, RMP Pizza, LLC and LePaul Love |
| 2:2019cv14702 |
| December 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Jane Triche Milazzo |
| Michael North |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion to Dismiss Case, as stated herein. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 01/30/2020. (am)
|
| Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Dismiss Removal as Duplicative by Domino's Pizza, LLC, RMP Pizza, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(DeRouen, Patrick) |
| Filing 3 Directive of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal filed by Domino's Pizza, LLC, RMP Pizza, LLC. (pp) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (ess) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, case number 2019-11373 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8038462) filed by RMP Pizza, LLC, Domino's Pizza, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Pleadings)Attorney Patrick Dominic DeRouen added to party Domino's Pizza, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Patrick Dominic DeRouen added to party RMP Pizza, LLC(pty:dft).(DeRouen, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
