Gaten et al v. Mountain Laurel Assurance Company et al
Shenica S. Hamilton, Minor Child, Jarmiah N. Gaten, Sr. and Farrin Kennedy |
Edward T. Perry and Mountain Laurel Assurance Company |
2:2019cv14729 |
December 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Barry W Ashe |
Dana Douglas |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0051 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #11 Statement of Corporate Disclosure.**Document has been stricken pursuant to Rule 5(d) of the FRCP.** (am) |
Filing 11 **STRICKEN PURSUANT TO RULE 5(D) OF THE FRCP**Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures by Jarmiah N. Gaten, Sr, Shenica S. Hamilton, Farrin Kennedy identifying Corporate Parent Jarmiah N. Gaten for Shenica S. Hamilton (Prange, Leo) Modified text on 2/20/2020 (am). |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/21/2020 02:00 PM before Judge Barry W Ashe. Jury Trial set for 8/10/2020 09:00 AM before Judge Barry W Ashe. All discovery must be completed by 7/10/2020. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 2/18/2020. (Attachments: #1 Pretrial Notice)(clc) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Hearing. Scheduling Conference set for 2/11/2020 02:00 PM before case manager by telephone. By Clerk. (clc) |
Filing 8 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #7 Amended Answer to Complaint.**Document marked as Filed in Error, should have been filed as an attachment to motion for leave.** (am) |
Filing 7 **FILED IN ERROR**AMENDED ANSWER to by Mountain Laurel Assurance Company, Edward T. Perry. (Savorgnan, Andrea) Modified text on 1/22/2020 (am). |
Filing 6 **DEFICIENT**EXPARTE/CONSENT First MOTION for Leave to File Amended Answer by Mountain Laurel Assurance Company, Edward T. Perry. Motion(s) referred to Dana Douglas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Savorgnan, Andrea) Modified text on 1/22/2020 (am). |
Filing 5 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Notice of Removal. The Notice of Compliance and Statement of Corporate Disclosure should be filed as separate docket entries instead of an attachment to the Notice of Removal. Clerk took corrective action by separating these attachments and docketing them separately. No further action necessary. (sa) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Barry W Ashe and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (go) |
Filing fee received from All Plaintiffs : $ 400 (receipt number ALAEDC-8038441 - Payment originally filed in CA 19-14701 applied to CA 19-14729) (lag) |
Filing 4 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Mountain Laurel Assurance Company identifying Corporate Parents/Affiliates: Progressive Corporation, Drive Insurance Holdings, Inc., Progressive Casualty Insurance Company for Mountain Laurel Assurance Company (sa) |
Filing 3 Notice of Compliance by Mountain Laurel Assurance Company, Edward T. Perry as to 28:1446 re #1 Notice of Removal. (sa) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand from Civil District Court, case number 2019-11434 (Fee previously paid) filed by Mountain Laurel Assurance Company, Edward T. Perry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Pleadings Exhibit, #3 Statement Listing of Parties, #4 Statement Corporate Disclosure Statement) Attorney Andrea C. Savorgnan added to party Mountain Laurel Assurance Company(pty:dft), Attorney Andrea C. Savorgnan added to party Edward T. Perry(pty:dft).(Savorgnan, Andrea) (Attachment 1 flattened & replaced on 12/31/2019) (sa). Modified on 12/31/2019 (sa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.