Southern Industrial Contractors, LLC v. Neel-Schaffer, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Southern Industrial Contractors, LLC
Defendant: W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Company, Quality Engineering Services, Inc., Neel-Schaffer, Inc., Yates Anderson, JV, Thompson Engineering, Inc., Roy Anderson Corp., T.L. Wallace Construction, Inc., CH2M Hill, Inc., W.G. Yates and Sons Construction Company and Roy Anderson Corp
Respondent: Baker Pile Driving & Site Work, LLC and Baker Pile Driving & Site Work, L.L.C.
Case Number: 2:2019mc12121
Filed: August 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Greg Gerard Guidry
Referring Judge: Janis van Meerveld
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2019 Filing 14 Minute Order. Proceedings were held before Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. A Telephone Status Conference was held on 9/25/2019. IT IS ORDERED that #1 Motion to Compel is DENIED AS MOOT as set out in document. (ajn)
September 20, 2019 Filing 13 Response/Reply by Thompson Engineering, Inc. in Support of Motion to Compel (Meyer, Christopher)
August 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that #10 Joint MOTION to Continue Hearing on Thompson's #1 Motion to Compel Against Third Party Baker Pile Driving & Site Work, LLC is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in document. Oral Argument is reset to 9/25/2019 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 8/26/2019.(ajn)
August 26, 2019 Filing 11 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #10 Joint MOTION to Continue Hearing on Motion to Compel and to Stay Proceedings. **1. Filing attorney did not enter additional filer(s) in the blank text box on the docket text screen. Clerk added filer(s). 2. Document does not contain Section and Magistrate Judge. All future pleadings must reflect Section T and Magistrate (1).** (mm)
August 23, 2019 Filing 10 EXPARTE/CONSENT Joint MOTION to Continue Hearing on Motion to Compel and to Stay Proceedings by Thompson Engineering, Inc., Baker Pile Driving & Site Work, L.L.C. Motion(s) referred to Janis van Meerveld. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Meyer, Christopher) Modified filer on 8/26/2019 (mm).
August 23, 2019 Filing 9 DEFICIENT: EXPARTE/CONSENT Joint MOTION to Continue Hearing on Motion to Compel and MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Thompson Engineering, Inc., Baker Pile Driving & Site Work, L.L.C. Motion(s) referred to Janis van Meerveld. (Meyer, Christopher) Modified text on 8/23/2019 (mm).
August 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The deadline set in this Court's Order dated 8/22/2019 (Rec. Doc. 7), requiring Defendant, Thompson Engineering, Inc., to file a reply memorandum addressing whether this court has authority to enforce the subpoena, is hereby extended. The reply memorandum shall be filed no later than 9:00 am on Monday, 8/26/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 8/23/2019.(ajn)
August 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that by 8/23/2019, at 5:00 p.m., Thompson shall file a reply memorandum addressing whether this court has authority to enforce the subpoena. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 8/22/2019.(ajn)
August 21, 2019 Filing 6 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #5 Response/Memorandum in Opposition to Motion. **Document lists counsel of record, G. Martin Warren, Jr., for a party in this action who has not been admitted to practice in this court. Any party not appearing in proper person must be represented by a member of the bar of this court (L.R. 83.2.4). Please see Local Rule 83.2.2 for this courts Procedures for Admission. Future filings which list attorneys not admitted pursuant to LR 83.2.2 or 83.2.5 will not be accepted.** (mm)
August 20, 2019 Filing 5 RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by Baker Pile Driving & Site Work, L.L.C. re #1 MOTION to Compel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(Garner, John)
August 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER SETTING ORAL ARGUMENT: IT IS ORDERED that Oral Argument on #1 MOTION to Compel will be held on Wednesday, 8/28/2019 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 8/13/2019. (cc: Baker Pile Driving and Site Work, LLC and G. Martin Warren, Jr.)(ajn)
August 9, 2019 Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Greg Gerard Guidry and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (cc)
August 9, 2019 Filing 2 **FILED IN ERROR - ATTACHED TO DOC. 1**NOTICE by Thompson Engineering, Inc. of Submission. (Meyer, Christopher) Modified text on 8/12/2019 (am).
August 9, 2019 Filing 1 Miscellaneous Case Petition of Defendant Thompson Engineering, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Against Third Party Baker Pile Driving & Site Work, LLC (Filing fee $ 47 receipt number 053L-7798369) filed by Thompson Engineering, Inc. Motion(s) referred to Janis van Meerveld. Motion(s) will be submitted on 8/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Subpoena, #4 Exhibit C - Letter from Counsel)Attorney Christopher Daniel Meyer added to party Thompson Engineering, Inc.(pty:dft).(Meyer, Christopher) Modified text on 8/12/2019 (am). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/12/2019: #5 Notice of Submission (Civil Only)) (am). Modified text on 8/12/2019 (am).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Southern Industrial Contractors, LLC v. Neel-Schaffer, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quality Engineering Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neel-Schaffer, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yates Anderson, JV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thompson Engineering, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Daniel Meyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roy Anderson Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T.L. Wallace Construction, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CH2M Hill, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: W.G. Yates and Sons Construction Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roy Anderson Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Baker Pile Driving & Site Work, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Baker Pile Driving & Site Work, L.L.C.
Represented By: John A. Scialdone
Represented By: John Steven Garner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Southern Industrial Contractors, LLC
Represented By: Jacob E. Roussel
Represented By: John Thomas Andrishok
Represented By: Steven B. Loeb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?