Blackmon et al v. Bracken Construction Company, Inc. et al
| Ruthie Blackmon, Ted Blackmon and Ted Mario Blackmon |
| Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Anthony Ver Meer, The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, Bracken Construction Company, Inc., Travelers Excess and Surplus Lines Company, Jhon Evelio Jaramillo, C3 Construction Services, Inc. and Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company |
| 2:2019mc12248 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Mary Ann Vial Lemmon |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Receipt of Transfer Case to Middle District of Louisiana (zmg) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 MOTION to Transfer Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Subpoena. Case transferred to Middle District of Louisiana. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 9/16/2019.(sbs)
|
| Filing 7 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Transfer Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Subpoena by Bracken Construction Company, Inc. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Attorney Philip G. Watson added to party Bracken Construction Company, Inc.(pty:dft).(Watson, Philip) Modified on 9/13/2019 (sbs). |
| Filing 6 Return of Service of #5 Order served on Bracken Construction Company, Inc. on 9/9/2019(sbs) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the submission date of Plaintiffs' #1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena is RESET to September 18, 2019. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any opposition to Plaintiffs' #1 Motion to Quash Subpoena shall be filed no later than Friday, September 13, 2019. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Ted Mario Blackmon's enrolled counsel of record are to provide the Court with evidence of service upon Defendant Bracken Construction Company, Inc., at the address noticed below no later than 10 days of the signing of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby.(cc: Bracken Construction Co., Inc. via certified mail)(mp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/6/2019: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (mp).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: To ensure that all parties have been noticed properly, the Court will reset the submission date and direct the Clerk's Office to mail the motion and this Order to the person who issued or requested the subpoena. IT IS ORDERED that the submission date of the #1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena is RESET to 9/11/2019 before the undersigned Chief Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cc Motion & Order: Bracken Construction Company, Inc.)(mp)
|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cc) |
| Filing fee received from Eulis Simien: Receipt LAE057474 $47 (cc) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Submission by Ted Blackmon re #1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena. (Bergeron, Roy) Modified text on 8/22/2019 (sbs). |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena by Ted Blackmon. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. Motion(s) will be submitted on 9/04/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C)Attorney Roy L. Bergeron, Jr added to party Ted Mario Blackmon(pty:pla).(Bergeron, Roy) (Main Document 1 and Attachments 1 and 2 replaced on 8/22/2019) (sbs). Modified text on 8/22/2019 (sbs). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/22/2019: #6 Notice of Submission (Civil Only)) (sbs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
