Nugent v. Scott Fetzer Company
Plaintiff: Charles Nugent
Defendant: Scott Fetzer Company
Not Classified By Court: The Scott Fetzer Company
Case Number: 2:2019mc14759
Filed: December 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Jane Triche Milazzo
Referring Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2020 Filing 19 REPLY to Response to Motion filed by Charles Nugent re #1 MOTION to Quash. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(mp)
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the #16 Motion for Leave to File Reply Memorandum is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on January 23, 2020. (mp)
January 22, 2020 Filing 17 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Chief Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby: Motion Hearing held on 1/22/2020 re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by Charles Nugent. Counsel for the Defendant Scott Fetzer Company is to provide the Court a supplemental letter regarding the relevance of Subpoena Request No. 7 no later than Friday, January 24, 2020. (Court Reporter Rebecca Gonzalez.) (mp)
January 21, 2020 Filing 16 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File Reply Memorandum by Charles Nugent. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Pleading, #3 Exhibit for reply memo, #4 Notice of Submission)(Bell, Paul) Modified text/removed submission date on 1/22/2020 (am).
January 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the #1 Motion to Quash Subpoena shall be heard by Oral Argument on 1/22/2020 at 11:00 AM before Chief Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on January 16, 2020.(mp)
January 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Christopher M McLaughlin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on January 15, 2020. (mp)
January 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Collin Flake. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on January 14, 2020. (mp)
January 14, 2020 Filing 12 RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by Scott Fetzer Company re #1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Presentation, #3 Exhibit Enclosure to Letter, #4 Exhibit Email, #5 Exhibit Subpoena, #6 Exhibit Request for Extension, #7 Exhibit Written Responses, #8 Exhibit Email, #9 Exhibit Email, #10 Exhibit Email)(Seemann, Charles)
January 13, 2020 Filing 11 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Collin Read Flake, #9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Christopher McLaughlin. **Filing attorney did not include a proposed order. Proposed Order subsequently provided to Clerk and has now been attached to the motion.** (am)
January 10, 2020 Filing 10 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Collin Read Flake (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-8078413) by Scott Fetzer Company. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Oath of Collin Read Flake, #3 Exhibit Certificate to Efile)(Harrell, Katelyn) Modified text on 1/13/2020 (am). (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2020: #4 Proposed Order) (am).
January 10, 2020 Filing 9 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Christopher McLaughlin (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number BLAEDC-8077948) by Scott Fetzer Company. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Oath of Christopher McLaughlin, #3 Exhibit Certificate to Efile)(Harrell, Katelyn) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2020: #4 Proposed Order) (am).
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Enroll as Counsel of Record for Attorneys Charles F. Seemann, III and Katelyn W. Harrell for Scott Fetzer Company. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (mp)
January 6, 2020 Filing 7 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Enroll as Counsel of Record Charles F. Seemann, III and Katelyn W. Harrell by Scott Fetzer Company. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Katelyn W. Harrell added to party Scott Fetzer Company(pty:dft).(Harrell, Katelyn) Modified text on 1/8/2020 (am).
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Caryn M. Groedel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on January 2, 2020. (mp)
December 31, 2019 Filing 5 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Caryn M. Groedel (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-8051667) by Charles Nugent. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Statement RE disciplinary proceedings, #2 Exhibit 2 Certificate of good standing, #3 Exhibit 3 Consent to electronic filing, #4 Proposed Order)(Bell, Paul) Modified text on 1/2/2020 (am).
December 27, 2019 Filing 4 **DEFICIENT**EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-8045832) by Charles Nugent. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 -- Statement RE disciplinary proceedings AND 2 -- Certificate of good standing, #2 Proposed Order)(Bell, Paul) Modified text on 12/30/2019 (am).
December 26, 2019 Filing 3 **FILED IN ERROR SHOULD HAVE BEEN FILED IN CASE 19-14758**MOTION to Receive Refund of Electronic Fees filed by Charles Nugent for the following reason: Aborted filing; Filed twice; receipt number ALAEDC-8042871. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bell, Paul) Modified text on 12/26/2019 (am). Modified on 12/30/2019 (am).
December 26, 2019 Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cc)
December 24, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena (Filing fee $ 47 receipt number ALAEDC-8042941) filed by Charles Nugent. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. Motion(s) will be submitted on 1/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena, #2 Exhibit 1 -- Subpoena to Charles Nugent, #3 Exhibit 2 -- Affidavit, #4 Exhibit 3 -- Subpoena to Timothy Updegraph, #5 Exhibit 4 -- Correspondence, #6 Proposed Order, #7 Notice of Submission, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Paul F. Bell added to party Charles Nugent(pty:pla).(Bell, Paul) Modified text/added referral/set submission date on 12/26/2019 (am).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nugent v. Scott Fetzer Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Nugent
Represented By: Paul F. Bell
Represented By: Caryn M. Groedel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: The Scott Fetzer Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Fetzer Company
Represented By: Christopher M McLaughlin
Represented By: Collin Flake
Represented By: Charles F. Seemann, III
Represented By: Katelyn W. Harrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?