Reed v. Royal Sonesta, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: ARIKA REED
Defendant: ROYAL SONESTA, INC. and KENNETH JACKSON
Case Number: 2:2020cv00384
Filed: February 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Referring Judge: Wendy B Vitter
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Order Vacating Case Referral to Magistrate Judge. All further proceedings will be held before the district judge. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 4/2/2020.(jeg)
April 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE OF 636(c) NON CONSENT ORDER: The undersigned Chief Magistrate Judge has been notified that all parties have not consented to proceed to trial before a Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (NEF: Sect. D)(mp)
March 26, 2020 Filing 11 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC 636(c), you are hereby notified that the assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge is available on the Court's website. All signed consent forms or written notice of non-consent by any individual party should be emailed to the Magistrate Judge's chambers: efile-Roby@laed.uscourts.gov. If, within seven (7) days of this notice, consent or nonconsent has not been established, the assigned Magistrate Judge will proceed with scheduling a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. (mp)
March 26, 2020 Filing 10 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #9 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration. ** Filing attorney did not input submission date when filing motion. Additionally, document contains invalid submission date. Correct date is 4/15/2020. Clerk took corrective action. No further action necessary.** (jeg)
March 25, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration by Royal Sonesta, Inc. Motion(s) will be submitted on 4/15/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1-3, #3 Notice of Submission, #4 Proposed Order)(Griffitts, Ryan) Modified text/submission date on 3/26/2020 (jeg).
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, as to Kenneth Jackson and Royal Sonesta, Inc. Answers due by 3/25/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on March 12, 2020. (mp)
March 11, 2020 Filing 7 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer. **Document should have been linked to another document by checking the box 'Should the document you are filing link to another document' or by selecting a related document on other appropriate screen. Clerk took corrective action by linking document to document 1. No further action necessary.** (jeg)
March 10, 2020 Filing 6 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint by Kenneth Jackson, Royal Sonesta, Inc. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Ryan Griffitts added to party Kenneth Jackson(pty:dft), Attorney Ryan Griffitts added to party Royal Sonesta, Inc.(pty:dft).(Griffitts, Ryan) Modified text/linkage on 3/11/2020 (jeg).
February 27, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Royal Sonesta, Inc. served on 2/19/2020, answer due 3/11/2020. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Hampton, Gerald)
February 6, 2020 Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint: Page 2 of summons not provided. For future filings, page 2 should be attached to page 1 of summons. Clerk has attached 2nd page of summons. Please use both pages when filing returns of service. No further action necessary. (ko)
February 6, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Kenneth Jackson, Royal Sonesta, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(ko)
February 4, 2020 Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (aj)
February 4, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8127378) filed by Arika Reed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)Attorney Gerald Joseph Hampton, Jr added to party Arika Reed(pty:pla).(Hampton, Gerald) (Attachments 1, 2, 3 replaced on 2/6/2020) (ko).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reed v. Royal Sonesta, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROYAL SONESTA, INC.
Represented By: Ryan Griffitts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KENNETH JACKSON
Represented By: Ryan Griffitts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ARIKA REED
Represented By: Gerald Joseph Hampton, Jr
Represented By: Damion Luke Jack
Represented By: Roddrick C Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?