Knight v. Social Security Administration
Richard Brandt Knight and Richard Brant Knight |
Social Security Administration |
2:2020cv00825 |
March 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Lance M Africk |
Dana Douglas |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. § 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, Office of the Attorney General, U.S. Attorney's Office. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(mp) |
Filing 3 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-8206577) by Richard Brandt Knight. Motion(s) referred to Dana Douglas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 ECF Registration, #3 Proposed Order)(Bourgeois, Loyd) Modified text/referral on 3/11/2020 (mp). |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (aj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8206144) filed by Richard Brandt Knight. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Office of General Counsel, #3 Summons U.S. Attorney General, #4 Summons U.S. Attorney's Office)Attorney Loyd J. Bourgeois, Jr added to party Richard Brandt Knight(pty:selreq).(Bourgeois, Loyd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.