Cangelosi v. Shang et al
| Clayton Cangelosi |
| Jefferson Parish and Cynthia Lee Shang |
| 2:2020cv00875 |
| March 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Dana Douglas |
| Sarah S Vance |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 00 U.S.C. ยง 0000 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE REGARDING LOCAL CIVIL RULE 54.7 re #1 Complaint filed by Clayton Cangelosi.(pp) |
Filing 3
RULE TO SHOW CAUSE and ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to withhold summons until the Court finds that plaintiff has satisfied the following rule to show cause. IT IS ORDERED that on or before Friday, May 15, 2020, plaintiff Clayton Cangelosi shall file a response containing a written statement of his position concerning this Court's Rule to Show Cause Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there will be NO ORAL HEARING, and the matter will be deemed under advisement on the briefs on Friday, May 15, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas on 3/17/20. (cg)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jefferson Parish, Cynthia Lee Shang filed by Clayton Cangelosi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(pp) |
| Filing 2 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Clayton Cangelosi. Motion(s) referred to Dana Douglas. (pp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
