Prestenbach v. Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans et al
| Shane Prestenbach |
| Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans and New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Corporation |
| 2:2020cv00983 |
| March 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Jane Triche Milazzo |
| Michael North |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Application for Refund of Electronic Fees filed by Shane Prestenbach for the following reason: filing fee paid twice; receipt number ALAEDC-8228250. (Stelly, William) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Corporation, Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(am) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (cc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Corporation, Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number BLAEDC-8228250) filed by Shane Prestenbach. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)Attorney William Chad Stelly added to party Shane Prestenbach(pty:pla).(Stelly, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
