Lacy v. Government Employees Insurance Company, et al
| Freddie Lacy |
| Government Employees Insurance Company and Jack Jones |
| 2:2020cv01296 |
| April 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Dana Douglas |
| Sarah S Vance |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 7/9/2020 10:45 AM before case manager by telephone.. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 6/25/2020.(jjs)
|
| Filing 10 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Government Employees Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent GEICO Corporation, Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Inc for Government Employees Insurance Company (Barry, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Government Employees Insurance Company, Jack Jones.(Barry, Stephen) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Plead re #1 Complaint. Defendants, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY (GEICO) and JACK JONES, are allowed one extension for a period of 21 days from the time the pleading would otherwise be due on behalf of said defendants. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 5/28/2020. (mm)
|
| Filing 7 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Plead re #1 Complaint by Government Employees Insurance Company, Jack Jones. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Attorney Stephen R. Barry added to party Government Employees Insurance Company(pty:dft), Attorney Stephen R. Barry added to party Jack Jones(pty:dft).(Barry, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Jack Jones served on 5/8/2020, answer due 5/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Noble, John) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Government Employees Insurance Company served on 5/9/2020, answer due 6/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Noble, John) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Government Employees Insurance Company, Jack Jones. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(mm) |
| Filing 3 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. **1. Name of attorney who electronically filed this document does not match name of signatory attorney on pleading. The user log-in and password serve as the required signature for purposes of Rule 11 of the FRCP. No further action is necessary. John B. Noble is the only attorney listed in the signature block, but complaint was filed by Waldon Hingle. Waldon Hingle must file a motion and order to enroll as additional counsel of record. 2. Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of the civil cover sheet and summons. The pdf should not have the blue boxes nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action.** (mm) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Sarah S. Vance and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (aj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8280569) filed by Freddie Lacy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) Attorney John B. Noble added to party Freddie Lacy(pty:pla).(Hingle, Waldon) (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/30/2020) (mm). (Attachment 2 replaced on 4/30/2020) (mm). (Attachment 3 replaced on 4/30/2020) (mm). Modified text on 4/30/2020 (mm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
