Zuppardo v. General Motors, LLC
Joseph Zuppardo |
General Motors, LLC and General Motors LLC |
2:2020cv01596 |
June 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Dana Douglas |
Wendy B Vitter |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE of Hearing. A call-in scheduling conference is set for 8/3/2020 11:30 AM before case manager by telephone. By Clerk. Please follow the instructions provided in the notice.(mmv) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by General Motors LLC.(Cassisa, Margaret) |
Filing 12 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by General Motors LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Motors Company, Corporate Parent General Motors Holdings LLC for General Motors LLC (Cassisa, Margaret) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by General Motors LLC.Attorney Margaret A. Cassisa added to party General Motors LLC(pty:dft).(Cassisa, Margaret) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against General Motors LLC filed by Joseph Zuppardo.(Dalton, Richard) |
Filing 9 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Amended Complaint (R. Doc. 8) be STRICKEN from the record for failure to comply with the Court's June 5, 2020 Order (R. Doc. 4), and the Court's June 10, 2020 Order (R. Doc. 7). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff, Joseph Zuppardo, shall have seven (7) days from the date of this Order to file a comprehensive amended Complaint, without further leave of Court, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 6/11/2020.(jeg) |
Filing 8 **STRICKEN per Order rec doc 9** AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against General Motors LLC filed by Joseph Zuppardo.(Dalton, Richard) Modified text on 6/11/2020 (jeg). Modified on 6/12/2020 (jeg). |
Filing 7 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Amended Complaint (R. Doc. 5) be STRICKEN from the record for failure to comply with the Courts June 5, 2020 Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff, Joseph Zuppardo, shall have seven (7) days from the date of this Order to file a comprehensive amended Complaint, without further leave of Court, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 6/10/2020.(jeg) |
Filing 6 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #5 Amended Complaint. **Document does not contain Section and Magistrate Judge. All future pleadings must reflect Section D Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate 3 Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. No further action necessary.** (jeg) |
Filing 5 **STRICKEN per Order rec doc 7** AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against General Motors LLC filed by Joseph Zuppardo.(Dalton, Richard) Modified on 6/10/2020 (jeg). |
Filing 4 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff, Joseph Zuppardo, shall have seven (7) days from the date of this Order to file a comprehensive amended Complaint, without further leave of Court, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 6/5/2020.(jeg) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to General Motors, LLC. (jeg) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (go) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against General Motors, LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8332103) filed by Joseph Zuppardo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Richard Collins Dalton added to party Joseph Zuppardo(pty:pla).(Dalton, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.