Adams et al v. Monsanto Company
Jesse R. Adams III, Carla Adams and Jesse R. Adams, III |
Monsanto Company |
2:2020cv01817 |
June 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Susie Morgan |
Michael North |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Receipt of Transfer Case to Northern District of California (pp) |
Filing 6 Order of MDL Transfer to Northern District of California. MDL case number is 2741. Electronic file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter)(sbs) |
Filing 5 Notice of Conditional Transfer Order from MDL Panel regarding MDL 2741. (sbs) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (sbs) |
Filing 3 Request of Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company filed by All Plaintiffs re #1 Complaint. (Sileo, John) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Susie Morgan and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (ess) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number ALAEDC-8373771) filed by Jesse R. Adams, III, Carla Adams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) Attorney John D. Sileo added to party Carla Adams(pty:pla), Attorney John D. Sileo added to party Jesse R. Adams, III(pty:pla).(Sileo, John) Modified text on 6/26/2020 (sbs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.