Hebert v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company et al
Ora Hebert |
Union Pacific Railroad Company, The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company |
2:2020cv02129 |
July 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Michael North |
Wendy B Vitter |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/23/2021 11:00 AM before Judge Wendy B Vitter. Status Conference set for 11/6/2020 03:00 PM before Judge Wendy B Vitter. Jury Trial set for 5/10/2021 09:00 AM before Judge Wendy B Vitter. All discovery must be completed by 2/22/2021. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 9/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Pretrial Notice Form)(jeg) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Hearing. A call-in scheduling conference is set for 9/24/2020 09:30 AM before case manager by telephone. By Clerk. Please follow the instructions provided in the notice.(mmv) |
Filing 10 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Union Pacific Railroad Company identifying Corporate Parent Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Corporate Parent Union Pacific Corporation, Corporate Parent Southern Pacific Rail Corporation for Union Pacific Railroad Company (jeg) |
Filing 9 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #8 Answer to Complaint. **1.Name of attorney who electronically filed this document does not match name of signatory attorney on pleading. The user log-in and password serve as the required signature for purposes of Rule 11 of the FRCP. 2. Statement of Corporate Disclosures should be filed as a separate docket entry instead of an attachment to the Answer. Clerk took corrective action by separating this attachment(s) and docketing it as a separate entry. No further action necessary.** (jeg) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Corporate Disclosure Statement)Attorney David Andrew Fraser added to party Union Pacific Railroad Company(pty:dft).(Fraser, David) |
Filing 7 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent Burlington Northern and Santa Fe LLC, Corporate Parent National Indemnity Company, Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway Inc. for Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (Dills, Kevin) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company.Attorney Kevin Michael Dills added to party Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company(pty:dft).(Dills, Kevin) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Union Pacific Railroad Company served on 7/31/2020, answer due 8/21/2020. (German-Oden, Carisa) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company served on 7/31/2020, answer due 8/21/2020. (German-Oden, Carisa) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(bm) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (cc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8420206) filed by Ora Hebert. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)Attorney Carisa Renee German-Oden added to party Ora Hebert(pty:pla).(German-Oden, Carisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.