Dominick et al. v. United States Postal Service, et al.
| Adam Dominick and Eddie Dominick |
| United States Postal Service Agency, Robin Bookman and United States Postal Service |
| 2:2020cv02307 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Barry W Ashe |
| Michael North |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(sa) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Robin Bookman, United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(sa) |
| Filing 4 Application for Refund of Electronic Fees filed by Adam Dominick for the following reason: Duplicate payment; receipt number ALAEDC-8458119. (Rieth, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Barry W Ashe and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (ess) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Fee previously paid) filed by Adam Dominick and Eddie Dominick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rieth, Kevin) Modified text/filers on 8/24/2020 (sa). |
| Filing 1 *FILED IN ERROR, See Doc. 2** COMPLAINT against Eddie Dominick (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8458257) filed by Adam Dominick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Kevin A Rieth added to party Adam Dominick(pty:pla).(Rieth, Kevin) Modified on 8/24/2020 (sa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
