Davis v. Starbucks Corporation
Myrna Guity Davis |
Starbucks Corporation |
2:2020cv02452 |
September 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Janis van Meerveld |
Jane Triche Milazzo |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 **DEFICIENT** AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Myrna Guity Davis filed by Myrna Guity Davis.(Shepherd, Hollis) Modified text on 10/15/2020 (am). |
Filing 10 **FILED IN ERROR 0 SEE RECL DOC. 11 **RESPONSE to Motion filed by Myrna Guity Davis re #8 Rule 12(e) Motion for More Definite Statement amended complaint. (Attachments: #1 certificate of service)(Shepherd, Hollis) Modified text on 10/15/2020 (am). |
Filing 8 Rule 12(e) Motion for More Definite Statement by Starbucks Corporation. Motion(s) will be submitted on 10/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Notice of Submission)(Druhan, Morgan) Modified text on 9/17/2020 (am). |
Filing 7 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #6 Statement of Corporate Disclosure, #5 Response/Reply. **Please, make sure to make the necessary correction to Section. The correct Section is "H".** (am) |
Filing 6 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Starbucks Corporation (Druhan, Morgan) |
Filing 5 Notice of Compliance by Starbucks Corporation to #1 Notice of Removal (Druhan, Morgan) Modified text on 9/11/2020 (am). |
Filing 4 Directive of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Starbucks Corporation. By the Clerk.(am) (Main Document 4 replaced on 9/10/2020) (am). |
Filing 3 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Notice of Removal. **Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of Civil Cover Sheet. The pdf should not have the purple fillable boxes nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk took corrective action.** (am) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (go) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Civil District Court, Orleans Parish, case number 2020-6062 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8488572) filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Secretary of State Info, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Morgan Ashley Druhan added to party Starbucks Corporation(pty:dft).(Druhan, Morgan) (Attachment 3 replaced on 9/10/2020) (am). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Davis v. Starbucks Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Myrna Guity Davis | |
Represented By: | Hollis Shepherd |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation | |
Represented By: | Morgan Ashley Druhan |
Represented By: | Rachel G. Webre |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.