Gutierrez-Lopez v. Wolf et al
| Antonio Gutierrez-Lopez |
| U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Attorney General of the United States and U.S. Department of Homeland Security |
| Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Chad Wolf and William P Barr |
| 2:2020cv02516 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Eldon E Fallon |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, as to Attorney General of the United States answer due 12/8/2020; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services answer due 12/8/2020; U.S. Department of Homeland Security answer due 12/8/2020. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 11/13/2020. (jeg)
|
| Filing 8 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, by Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Glenn Kenneth Schreiber added to party Attorney General of the United States(pty:dft), Attorney Glenn Kenneth Schreiber added to party U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft), Attorney Glenn Kenneth Schreiber added to party U.S. Department of Homeland Security(pty:dft).(Schreiber, Glenn) |
| Filing 7 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #6 Summons Returned Executed, #5 Summons Returned Executed. ** Filing attorney selected incorrect event. Correct event is Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Agency of USA. Clerk took corrective action by changing the event and modify the answer due dates: EDLA US Attorney's Office served on 9/16/2020, answer due 11/16/2020; United States served on 9/23/2020, answer due 11/23/2020.** (jeg) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Attorney General of the United States served on 9/23/2020, answer due 11/23/2020. (McLin, Jaesa) Modified text/answer due date on 10/8/2020 (jeg). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Attorney General of the United States Attorney General served on 9/16/2020, answer due 11/16/2020. (McLin, Jaesa) Modified text/answer due date on 10/8/2020 (jeg). |
| Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus. **1.Filing attorney included multiple summons as one attachment instead of one summons form per attachment. Clerk separated attachment in order to issue summons. Please follow this requirement on future pleadings. 2. Filing attorney did not include summons for the local US Attorney's Office. Clerk prepared summons for the local US Attorney's Office and issued them. No further action necessary.** (jeg) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(jeg) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Eldon E. Fallon and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (ess) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus against William P Barr, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Chad Wolf (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8498166) filed by Antonio Gutierrez-Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)Attorney Jaesa Woods McLin added to party Antonio Gutierrez-Lopez(pty:pet).(McLin, Jaesa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
