Clanton v. Vannoy et al
Plaintiff: Evelyn Clanton
Defendant: Darryl Vannoy
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Case Number: 2:2020cv02639
Filed: September 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Greg Gerard Guidry
Referring Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) as to Darryl Vannoy. Responsive pleadings due by 12/4/2020. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (mp)
November 2, 2020 Filing 8 EXPARTE/CONSENT First MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) by Darryl Vannoy. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Irena Zajickova added to party Darryl Vannoy(pty:dft).(Zajickova, Irena)
October 15, 2020 Filing 7 Return of Service of H/C Response Order served on Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office on 10/13/2020.(mm)
October 9, 2020 Filing 6 Return of Service of H/C Response Order served on Orleans Parish Clerk of Criminal Court on 10/6/2020.(mm)
October 8, 2020 Filing 5 Return of Service of H/C Response Order served on Attorney General on 10/5/2020.(mm)
October 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Habeas Corpus Response Order that Attorney General for the State of Louisiana and the District Attorney for Orleans Parish respond to the petition of Habeas Corpus within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 10/2/2020. (caa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/2/2020: #1 Return Receipts for Mailing of HC Response Order) (sa).
October 2, 2020 Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Evelyn Clanton. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mm)
October 2, 2020 Filing fee paid re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Filing fee $ 5) (mm)
September 29, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 10/20/2020. (mm)
September 24, 2020 Filing 1 DEFICIENT: PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Evelyn Clanton. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clanton v. Vannoy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evelyn Clanton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darryl Vannoy
Represented By: Irena Zajickova
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?