Adams v. Walker et al
Mr. Manuel Adams, Jr. and Manuel Adams, Jr. |
Keith Moody, Robert Walker, City of Harahan and Harahan City |
2:2020cv02794 |
October 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Dana Douglas |
Jane Triche Milazzo |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Harahan City, Keith Moody, Robert Walker. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(pp) |
Filing fee received from Venegas, Brandon: Receipt ALAEDC-8542745 $ 400 (cc) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (cc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Fee previously paid) filed by Manuel Adams, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Keith Moody, #3 Summons Robert Walker, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 1 Advocate Article, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 2 Citizens Complaint, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 3 Loan Documents, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 4 Resume and References, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 5 MOODY Campaign, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 6 Email re Lightell, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 7 Email re DD, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 8 Email re: Adams, #12 Exhibit Exhibit 9 Notice of Investigation, #13 Exhibit Exhibit 11 Sample Social Media MOODY, #14 Exhibit Exhibit M-1 Military Charges, #15 Summons City of Harahan)Attorney Brandon Venegas added to party Manuel Adams, Jr.(pty:pla).(Venegas, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.