Williams et al v. Rasier, LLC et al
| Hanaiya Williams and Thomas Isaacson |
| James River Insurance Company and Rasier, LLC |
| 2:2020cv02818 |
| October 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Carl Barbier |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to William G. Legrand. This matter was filed on October 14, 2020. The Clerk's records reflect that plaintiff Hanaiya Williams' co-counsel, William G. Legrand, has been suspended for failure to pay attorney dues five or more years. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that William G. Legrand, petition the court for re-admission, substitution or withdrawal on or before December 18, 2020, or show cause on that date by written memorandum why he should not be removed from this case.. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 11/19/20.(cg)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Vincent R. Arnona. This matter was filed on October 14, 2020. The Clerk's records reflect that intervenor Thomas Isaacson's co-counsel, Vincent R. Arnona, is not admitted to the Eastern District of Louisiana. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Vincent R. Arnona petition the court for admission1 on or before December 18, 2020, or show cause on that date by written memorandum why he should not be removed from this case. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 11/19/20.(cg)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Christopher W. Legrand. This matter was filed on October 14, 2020. The Clerks records reflect that plaintiff Hanaiya Williams co-counsel, Christopher W. Legrand, is not admitted to the Eastern District of Louisiana. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Christopher W. Legrand petition the court for admission1 on or before December 18, 2020 or show cause on that date by written memorandum why he should not be removed from this case. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 11/19/20.(cg)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal,, with Jury Demand by James River Insurance Company.(Poole, John) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - Considering that the Court has been advised that Hanaiya Williams and James River Insurance Company have reached a settlement regarding their claims in this matter, IT IS ORDERED that Hanaiya William's claims against James River Insurance Company in the above-captioned matter are hereby dismissed without costs, and without prejudice, with the right upon good cause shown, within sixty days, for the parties to seek summary judgment enforcing the compromise if it is not consummated by that time. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 10/26/20.(cg)
|
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl Barbier and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (go) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 24th Judicial District Court Parish of Jefferson, case number 799-651 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8547652) filed by James River Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Pleading, #2 Exhibit State Court Pleading, #3 Exhibit Dismissal, #4 Exhibit UM Demand of Isaacson, #5 Exhibit USPS Tracking, #6 Exhibit State Court Record, #7 Exhibit Certificate of Service, #8 Exhibit James River 7.1, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney John Reed Poole, Jr added to party James River Insurance Company(pty:dft).(Poole, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
