Adams v. Siemens Industry, Inc.
Plaintiff: Thomas E. Adams
Defendant: Siemens Industry, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2020cv03010
Filed: November 5, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Donna Phillips Currault
Referring Judge: Mary Ann Vial Lemmon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The court having been advised by counsel for the parties that all of the parties to this action have firmly agreed upon a compromise, IT IS ORDERED that the action be and it is hereby dismissed without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown, to reopen the action or to seek summary judgment enforcing the compromise if settlement is not consummated within a reasonable time. Each party will bear its own costs. The Court retains jurisdiction for all purposes, including enforcing the settlement agreement entered into by the parties. If witnesses have been subpoenaed, EVERY WITNESS MUST be notified by counsel not to appear. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 10/22/2021.(cwa)
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault: Settlement Conference held on 10/21/2021. After extensive settlement discussions with the parties and counsel, the court was advised that a settlement has been reached. By copy of this minute entry, Judge Lemmon is advised so that she may enter an appropriate 60-day conditional dismissal order. Signed by Judge Donna Phillips Currault on 10/21/2021. (NEF: Section S) (sa)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that a Settlement Conference is scheduled for THURSDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2021, at 9:00 a.m., before Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault. At least two (2) full business days before the conference, each party shall provide a confidential, concise position letter or memorandum no longer than four (4) pages double-spaced, to Chambers via email. It is the duty of the parties to notify my Chambers if this case is continued, settled, or otherwise disposed of prior to the date of the scheduled settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault on 9/30/2021. (NEF: Section S) (sa)
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER: All discovery must be completed by 1/14/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/17/2022 at 2:00 PM before Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon. Jury Trial set for 3/28/2022 at 9:00 AM before Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 6/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 Pretrial Notice Form) (NEF: Magistrate Judge)(sbs)
May 26, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE: Scheduling Conference set for 6/10/2021 at 10:30 AM before case manager by telephone. By Clerk.(sbs)
April 22, 2021 Filing 12 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Siemens Industry, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Siemens Corporation; Siemens USA Holdings, Inc.; Siemens Beteiligungen USA GmbH; Siemens Beteiligungen Inland GmbH; Siemens AG. (Grant, Ashlee) Modified text, added corporate parents on 4/22/2021 (sbs).
April 5, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE: The Preliminary Conference currently scheduled for Thursday, April 8, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. is hereby VACATED. The Court's case manager will reset this preliminary conference and issue a new preliminary conference notice in the near future. By the Clerk.(sbs)
March 29, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE: Scheduling Conference set for 4/8/2021 at 10:00 AM before case manager by telephone. By Clerk.(sbs)
March 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - The parties have advised the Court (see attached) that they do not have unanimous consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28:636(c). Accordingly, the presiding District Judge is hereby notified so that she may revoke the automatic referral and schedule a conference to set pretrial and trial dates on her calendar. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault on 3/25/2021. (NEF: Section S) (sa)
March 23, 2021 Filing 8 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault: Preliminary Conference held on 3/23/2021. The parties were instructed to notify the Court within 48 hours of the preliminary conference whether there is consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28:636(c), and, if so, to return the signed consent form previously provided. The Court discussed discovery issues with the parties, instructing the parties to hold their Rule 26(f) conference within two weeks from today and exchange initial disclosures within 30 days from today. Signed by Judge Donna Phillips Currault on 3/24/2021. (NEF: Section S) (sa)
March 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Justin Caresia. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault on 2/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice) (caa)
February 25, 2021 Filing 6 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Justin Caresia (Filing fee $100 receipt number ALAEDC-8752053) by Siemens Industry, Inc. Motion(s) referred to Donna Phillips Currault. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Proposed Order)(Grant, Ashlee) Modified text on 2/26/2021 (sbs).
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that a Preliminary Conference by video is hereby scheduled in this matter on TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2021 at 9:00 a.m., before the undersigned Magistrate Judge. No later than five (5) days prior to the preliminary conference, counsel shall confer with all other parties to determine whether there is unanimous consent to proceed to trial before the Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent, the attached form is to be circulated, with each party signing the same form. A log-in invitation for the video conference will be emailed to counsel shortly before the scheduled conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault on 2/19/2021.(sa)
February 12, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Siemens Industry, Inc. Attorney Ashlee Cassman Grant added to party Siemens Industry, Inc.(pty:dft).(Grant, Ashlee)
December 28, 2020 Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Siemens Industry, Inc. on 12/14/2020, answer due 2/12/2021. (Pieksen, John)
November 5, 2020 Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon and Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault. (go)
November 5, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Siemens Industry, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number ALAEDC-8582970) filed by Thomas E. Adams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney John Oliver Pieksen, Jr added to party Thomas E. Adams(pty:pla).(Pieksen, John) Modified text on 11/5/2020 (sbs). (WAIVER OF SERVICE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. Siemens Industry, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Siemens Industry, Inc.
Represented By: Justin Caresia
Represented By: Ashlee Cassman Grant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas E. Adams
Represented By: John Oliver Pieksen, Jr.
Represented By: John Oliver Pieksen, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?