Moree et al v. Chevron Pipeline Company et al
| Fran Moree and Kenneth Moree |
| Clack Corporation, Chevron Pipeline Company, DXP Enterprises, Inc. and Unidentified Parties |
| 2:2020cv03160 |
| November 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Dana Douglas |
| Jay C Zainey |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER Granting #6 Motion to Remand to State Court and this matter is hereby remanded to state court for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 1/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Remand Letter) (ajn)
|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion filed by Chevron Pipeline Company re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court . (LeFeve, McCann) |
| Filing 14 Response/Reply by Clack Corporation to #13 Response to Motion to Remand by Plaintiffs (Thames, L.) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion filed by DXP Enterprises, Inc. re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court . (Glass, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #11 Statement of Corporate Disclosure. **Filing attorney did not enter Blackrock, Inc.as a corporate parent(s) at the prompt 'Search for a corporate parent or other affiliate'. Clerk took corrective action.** (am) |
| Filing 11 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by DXP Enterprises, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Blackrock, Inc. for DXP Enterprises, Inc. by DXP Enterprises, Inc. (Glass, Joseph) Modified text on 12/30/2020 (am). |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by DXP Enterprises, Inc. (Glass, Joseph) Modified text on 12/28/2020 (lt). |
| Filing 9 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Chevron Pipeline Company identifying Corporate Parent Chevron Corporation for Chevron Pipeline Company (LeFeve, McCann) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Chevron Pipeline Company. Attorney McCann Elizabeth LeFeve added to party Chevron Pipeline Company(pty:dft).(LeFeve, McCann) Modified text on 12/22/2020 (lt). |
| Filing 7 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court . **This Motion to Remand is set for submission on 1/20/2021, per chambers, before Judge Jay C. Zainey.*** (ajn) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Fran Moree, Kenneth Moree. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Notice of Submission)(Hooks, Kenneth) Motion(s) will be submitted on 1/20/2021. (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/18/2020: #6 Proposed Order) (ajn). Modified text on 12/21/2020 to add submission date (ajn). |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses by Clack Corporation.Attorney L. Adam Thames added to party Clack Corporation(pty:dft).(Thames, L.) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Compliance with Removal Order by DXP Enterprises, Inc. re #3 Order. (Glass, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 DIRECTIVE Pursuant to 28:1446(b) by Clerk re #1 Notice of Removal.(ajn) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jay C. Zainey and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (cc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 25th JDC - Plaquemine Parish, case number 66360, Sec. A (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8607061) filed by DXP Enterprises, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State court record, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Notice to Adverse Party of Removal to Federal Court)Attorney Joseph G. Glass added to party DXP Enterprises, Inc.(pty:dft).(Glass, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
