Slann v. Eagle, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Matthew Slann, Jr.
Defendant: Exxon Mobil Corporation, Professional Maintenance of New Orleans, Inc., Cooper T Smith Stevedoring Co., Inc., Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa, Ltd., Taylor Seidenbach, Inc., McCarty Corporation, Cooper Stevedoring of Louisiana, Inc., South African Marine Corporation Ltd, Anco Insulations Inc, Building Maintenance of Louisiana, Inc., T Smith & Sons Inc, Union Carbide Corporation, Exxon Corporation and Eagle Inc.
Case Number: 2:2020cv03347
Filed: December 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Janis van Meerveld
Referring Judge: Jane Triche Milazzo
2 Judge: Susie Morgan
Nature of Suit: P.I. : Asbestos
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER AND REASONS: DENYING #8 Motion to Remand to State Court, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 2/4/2021. (am)
January 27, 2021 Filing 17 Minute Order. Proceedings held before Judge Jane Triche Milazzo: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand #8 is argued by counsel and taken under submission by the Court. (Court Reporter Karen Ibos.) (am)
January 20, 2021 Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion filed by Matthew Slann, Jr re #8 MOTION to Remand . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order and Opinion of Judge Jay C. Zainey)(Colley, Christopher)
January 19, 2021 Filing 15 RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation re #8 MOTION to Remand . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Bienvenu, David)
January 11, 2021 Filing 14 RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation re #10 MOTION to Expedite Hearing on Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. No. 8) . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Viator, John)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #10 MOTION to Expedite Hearing on Motion to Remand. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any opposition to Plaintiff's #8 Motion to Remand shall be filed by 1/19/2021, and any reply shall be filed by 1/22/2021. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that oral argument is SET for 1/27/2021 at 9:30 a.m. by video. A link to join the video hearing will be disseminated to counsel at a later date. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 1/11/2021.(mm)
January 11, 2021 Filing 12 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #8 MOTION to Remand. **Motion will be accepted by Chambers. Disregard the deficiency sent out for record document 8. Do not refile the motion.** (mm)
January 11, 2021 Filing 11 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #10 MOTION to Expedite Hearing on Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. No. 8). **Filing attorney should have selected 'Yes' at the question 'Is this an Exparte/Consent Motion Y/N?'. Exparte/Consent Motions are not set for submission. Clerk modified docket text to reflect 'Exparte' and removed submission date.** (mm)
January 8, 2021 Filing 10 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Expedite Hearing on Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. No. 8) by Matthew Slann, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Exh A to Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibit Exh. B to Memorandum in Support, #4 Exhibit Exh. C to Memorandum in Support, #5 Exhibit Exh. D to Memorandum in Support, #6 Proposed Order, #7 Notice of Submission)(Colley, Christopher) Modified text/removed submission date on 1/11/2021 (mm).
January 8, 2021 Filing 9 Request/Statement of Oral Argument by Matthew Slann, Jr regarding #8 MOTION to Remand. (Colley, Christopher)
January 8, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Remand by Matthew Slann, Jr. Motion(s) will be submitted on 1/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Exh A to Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibit Exh. B to Memorandum in Support, #4 Exhibit Exh. C to Memorandum in Support, #5 Exhibit Exh. D to Memorandum in Support, #6 Exhibit Exh. E to Memorandum in Support, #7 Exhibit Exh. F to Memorandum in Support, #8 Exhibit Exh. G to Memorandum in Support, #9 Exhibit Exh. H to Memorandum in Support, #10 Exhibit Exh. I to Memorandum in Support, #11 Exhibit Exh. J to Memorandum in Support, #12 Exhibit Exh. K to Memorandum in Support, #13 Exhibit Exh. L to Memorandum in Support, #14 Exhibit Exh. M to Memorandum in Support, #15 Proposed Order, #16 Notice of Submission)(Colley, Christopher)
December 17, 2020 Filing 7 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Exxon Mobil Corporation (Viator, John)
December 17, 2020 Filing 6 Notice of Compliance with L.R. 3.2 by Exxon Mobil Corporation. (Attachments: #1 State Court Pleadings, #2 State Court Pleadings, #3 State Court Pleadings, #4 State Court Pleadings, #5 State Court Pleadings, #6 State Court Pleadings, #7 State Court Pleadings, #8 State Court Pleadings)(Viator, John)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Lance M Africk recused. Case reassigned to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 12/11/2020.(cwa)
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Susie Morgan recused. Case reassigned to Judge Lance M Africk. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 12/10/2020. (NEF: Section I)(sbs)
December 10, 2020 Filing 3 Directive of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation. By the Clerk.(bm)
December 9, 2020 Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Susie Morgan and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (aj)
December 9, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Civil District Court, case number 2019-6242 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-8635290) filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit W, #24 Civil Cover Sheet, #25 Notice of Removal to Adverse Parties)Attorney John Allain Viator added to party Exxon Mobil Corporation(pty:dft).(Viator, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Slann v. Eagle, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Slann, Jr.
Represented By: Jeremiah S. Boling
Represented By: Kristopher Lynn Thompson
Represented By: David Ryan Cannella
Represented By: Benjamin David Rumph
Represented By: Christopher C. Colley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exxon Mobil Corporation
Represented By: John Allain Viator
Represented By: Melissa Jade Shaffer
Represented By: James McClendon Williams
Represented By: Anthony Joseph Lascaro
Represented By: Patrick R Follette
Represented By: Inemesit U. O'Boyle
Represented By: Erin Brooke Rigsby
Represented By: Lexi T. Holinga
Represented By: Nicholas Ryan Varisco
Represented By: David Mark Bienvenu, Jr.
Represented By: Daniel Edwin Buras, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Professional Maintenance of New Orleans, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cooper T Smith Stevedoring Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Taylor Seidenbach, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McCarty Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cooper Stevedoring of Louisiana, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South African Marine Corporation Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anco Insulations Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Building Maintenance of Louisiana, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T Smith & Sons Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exxon Corporation
Represented By: John Allain Viator
Represented By: Melissa Jade Shaffer
Represented By: James McClendon Williams
Represented By: Anthony Joseph Lascaro
Represented By: Patrick R Follette
Represented By: Inemesit U. O'Boyle
Represented By: Erin Brooke Rigsby
Represented By: Lexi T. Holinga
Represented By: Nicholas Ryan Varisco
Represented By: David Mark Bienvenu, Jr.
Represented By: Daniel Edwin Buras, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eagle Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?