DG Louisiana et al
Corina Romero |
Dolgencorp, LLC and DG Louisiana |
2:2020xc02632 |
September 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE OF DEFICIENT CASE OPENING: Filed in wrong court. (ess) |
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion for Refund. The $400.00 filing fee shall be refunded to defendants, DG Louisiana, LLC and Dolgencorp, LLC d/b/a Dollar General. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 9/30/2020. (jls) (NEF: Financial) |
Filing 3 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION Motion for Refund by DG Louisiana, Dolgencorp, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Medo, Anne) (Main Document 3 replaced on 9/30/2020) (jls). (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/30/2020: #3 Proposed Order) (jls). |
Filing 2 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by DG Louisiana, Dolgencorp, LLC (Medo, Anne) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 15th Judicial District Court, Parish of Vermilion, case number 108528 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8520854) filed by DG Louisiana, Dolgencorp, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)Attorney Anne Elizabeth Medo added to party DG Louisiana(pty:selreq), Attorney Anne Elizabeth Medo added to party Dolgencorp, LLC(pty:selreq).(Medo, Anne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.