Savage v. Bickham et al
| Damien Savage |
| Rayburn Correctional Center and Edward Dustin Bickham |
| Attorney General State of Louisiana |
| 2:2021cv00281 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Jay C Zainey |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer as to Edward Dustin Bickham, and Respondent shall have until Monday, May 3, 2021, to file a response in accordance with the Court's briefing order. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 4/6/2021. (jeg)
|
| Filing 12 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Edward Dustin Bickham. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Gail Denise Schlosser added to party Edward Dustin Bickham(pty:dft).(Schlosser, Gail) Modified text on 4/2/2021 (jeg). |
| Filing 11 Return of Service of H.C. Response Order served on D.A.'s Office on 3/4/2021.(ajn) |
| Filing 10 Return of Service of H.C. Response Order served on Clerk of 24th JDC on 3/5/2021.(ajn) |
| Filing 9 Return of Service of H.C. Response Order served on Attorney General Office on 3/5/2021(ajn) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER that Savages Motion for Leave to File Additional Documents #6 is GRANTED in part to allow the filing of exhibits I and L attached to his motion, and DENIED in part to the extent he seeks leave to pursue discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 3/4/2021. (caa)
|
|
Filing 7
Habeas Corpus Response Order that Attorney General for the State of Louisiana and the District Attorney for Jefferson Parish respond to the petition of Habeas Corpus within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 3/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipts sent to Clerk, D.A., Attorney General)(caa)
|
| Filing 6 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File to File Additional Documents by Damien Savage. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Contents, #3 Exhibit I, #4 Exhibit L, #5 Cover Letter)(ajn) |
| Filing fee paid re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254)(Filing fee $5) Receipt #LAE066420 (ajn) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on February 23, 2021. (mp)
|
| Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Damien Savage. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Original IFP Motion)(ajn) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe DOCUMENT: re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 3/3/2021. (ajn) |
| Filing 2 **DEFICIENT** EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Damien Savage. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (ajn) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Damien Savage. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 List of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajn) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/4/2021: #16 Exhibit I, #17 Exhibit L) (caa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
