Widmer v. Smith et al
Mr Jason Widmer and Jason Widmer |
Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company, Dr. Walter T Smith and Walter T Smith |
2:2021cv00381 |
February 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Lance M Africk |
Janis van Meerveld |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company on 2/22/2021, answer due 4/23/2021; Walter T Smith on 2/22/2021, answer due 4/23/2021. (Attachments: #1 Summons Waiver of Summons)(McGovern, Glenn) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company, Walter T. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(cwa) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (go) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number ALAEDC-8745086) filed by Jason Widmer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Exhibit P-1, #5 Exhibit P-2, #6 Exhibit P-3, #7 Exhibit P-4, #8 Exhibit P-5, #9 Exhibit P-6)Attorney Glenn Charles McGovern added to party Jason Widmer(pty:pla).(McGovern, Glenn) Modified text on 2/23/2021 (cwa). Modified on 2/23/2021 - Attachment 5, 6, 7 replaced with redacted versions (blg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.