Robinson v. Gonzales et al
| Sherman Ernesto Robinson |
| Adam Gonzales |
| Attorney General State of Texas |
| 2:2021cv00502 |
| March 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Ivan LR Lemelle |
| Michael North |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Receipt of Transfer Case to Western District of Texas (pp) |
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the petition of Sherman Ernesto Robinson for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254, is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 4/7/2021.(pp)
|
| Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Sherman Ernesto Robinson. RECOMMENDED that the above-captioned habeas petition be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division. Objections to R&R due by 3/29/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 3/15/2021. (NEF: Sect B)(caa) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Sherman Ernesto Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(pp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
