Gagliano et al v. Monsanto Company
| Lori T. Gagliano, Charles J. Gagliano and Lori Toups Gagliano |
| Monsanto Company |
| 2:2021cv00645 |
| March 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Mary Ann Vial Lemmon |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Receipt of Case Transfer to Northern District of California (ko) |
Filing 5
Order of MDL Transfer to Northern District of California. MDL case number is 2741. Electronic file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter)(sbs)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Conditional Transfer Order from MDL Panel regarding MDL 2741. (sbs) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (sbs) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (aj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Monsanto Company (Filing fee $402 receipt number ALAEDC-8796335) filed by Charles J. Gagliano, Lori Toups Gagliano. Attorney Richard Hobbs Barker, IV added to party Charles J. Gagliano(pty:pla), Attorney Richard Hobbs Barker, IV added to party Lori Toups Gagliano(pty:pla).(Barker, Richard) Modified text and filer on 3/31/2021 (sbs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
