ADT Commercial LLC v. Pomes et al
ADT COMMERCIAL LLC |
Patrick Comeaux, Securance Technologies, LLC and Michael Pomes, Sr. |
2:2021cv00657 |
March 31, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Donna Phillips Currault |
Susie Morgan |
Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by ADT COMMERCIAL LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Pomes' Incentive Bonus Pool Agreement, #3 Exhibit B - ADT Code of Conduct, #4 Exhibit C - ADT Asset Protection Policy, #5 Exhibit D - ADT Acceptable Use Policy, #6 Exhibit E - Securance Master Subcontract Agreement, #7 Exhibit F - Declaration of Louis Quijano, #8 Exhibit G - Declaration of Kenny Weeks, #9 Proposed Temporary Restraining Order)(London, William) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Susie Morgan and Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault. (aj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-8798135) filed by ADT COMMERCIAL LLC. (Attachments: #1 Sworn Verification of Louis Quijano, #2 Sworn Verification of Kenny Weeks, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons for Michael Pomes, Sr., #5 Summons for Securance Technologies, LLC, #6 Summons for Patrick Comeaux)Attorney William B. London added to party ADT COMMERCIAL LLC(pty:pla).(London, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.