Bowlsbey v. Patterson Structural Moving & Shoring, LLC et al
| Harold Bowlsbey |
| Patterson Structural Moving & Shoring, LLC, Jeremy Patterson and Greg Patterson |
| 2:2021cv01421 |
| July 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Jay C Zainey |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Patterson Structural Moving & Shoring, LLC served on 8/6/2021, answer due 8/27/2021. (Jackson, Mary) |
| Filing 4 DEFICIENT: AFFIDAVIT of Service by Timothy Couch of Complaint served on Patterson Structural Moving & Shoring, LLC on August 6, 2021. (Jackson, Mary) Modified text on 9/7/2021 (lw). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Greg Patterson, Jeremy Patterson, Patterson Structural Moving & Shoring, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(lw) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jay C. Zainey and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (go) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-8967897) filed by Harold Bowlsbey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit FLSA Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Request for Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)Attorney Mary Bubbett Jackson added to party Harold Bowlsbey(pty:pla).(Jackson, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
