Hinson v. Judiciary Division for the State of Louisiana
Milton R. Hinson and Milton Raymond Hinson |
Judiciary Division for the State of Louisiana |
2:2021cv01536 |
August 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Michael North |
Wendy B Vitter |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDERED that the #3 Response to Notice of Deficient Filing is hereby liberally construed as an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, (rec. doc. 3) is DENIED as set forth in document. The Court may reconsider the application at a later time if/when Plaintiff submits the appropriate documentation, including a certified account statement by prison officials. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 9/29/2021.(jls) |
Filing 3 Response to #2 Notice of Deficient Filing filed by Milton R. Hinson (jeg) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Complaint. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 9/8/2021. (sdp) |
Filing 1 ***DEFICIENT*** COMPLAINT against Judiciary Division for the State of Louisiana filed by Milton R. Hinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.