Payne v. 4447591 Manitoba Ltd.
John Payne |
4447591 Manitoba Ltd. d/b/a Roadtrips and 4447591 Manitoba Ltd. doing business as Roadtrips |
2:2021cv01572 |
August 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Lance M Africk |
Dana Douglas |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, as to 4447591 Manitoba Ltd. answer due 11/2/2021. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 10/12/2021. (ko) |
Filing 5 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, by 4447591 Manitoba Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Justin Paul Lemaire added to party 4447591 Manitoba Ltd.(pty:dft).(Lemaire, Justin) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed; 4447591 Manitoba Ltd. served on 9/20/2021, answer due 10/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Timpa, Andrea) (Attachment 3 replaced on 9/29/2021) (cwa). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to 4447591 Manitoba Ltd. (bw) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (aj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 4447591 Manitoba Ltd. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9000669) filed by John Payne. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Patrick S. McGoey added to party John Payne(pty:pla).(McGoey, Patrick) Modified text on 8/20/2021 (bw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.