Manuel v. Patterson et al
| Tranisha Manuel |
| Destony Patterson, Rent to Own Outlet, LLC, The Travelers Indemnity Company, Root Insurance Company and Travelers Indemnity Company |
| 2:2021cv01590 |
| August 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Martin LC Feldman |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
REPLY to Response to Motion filed by Tranisha Manuel re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(sa)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion for Leave to File Reply Memorandum. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 9/29/2021. (sa)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER AND REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's #4 Motion to Remand to State Court is DENIED, as set forth herein. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 9/29/2021. (sa)
|
|
Filing 10
Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #9 Reply to Response to Motion. Filing attorney selected incorrect event. Correct event is "Motion for Leave to File Document." Clerk took corrective action to change event. No further action necessary. (sa)
|
|
Filing 9
EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File Reply Memorandum, filed by Tranisha Manuel re 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Pleading, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Proposed Order)(Harrison, Roddrick) Modified text/event on 9/29/2021 (sa).
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: that the hearing on the plaintiff's #4 Motion to remand is hereby continued to September 29, 2021, on the papers. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 9/14/2021.(sa)
|
|
Filing 7
RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by Travelers Indemnity Company re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Albert, Andrea)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Compliance List of Attorneys and Parties in the State Court Action by Travelers Indemnity Company re #3 Order. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Albert, Andrea)
|
|
Filing 5
Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court. Document contains Exhibits that were legal-sized pages and also scanned sideways. Clerk took corrective action to reduce the page size to Letter & rotate those Exhibits. No further action necessary. (sa)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Remand to State Court by Tranisha Manuel. Motion(s) will be submitted on 9/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Petition for Damages, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Proposed Order, #6 Notice of Submission)(Harrison, Roddrick) (Attachments 2-4 corrected images and replaced on 8/26/2021) (sa). Modified on 8/26/2021 (sa).
|
|
Filing 3
Directive of the Clerk regarding compliance 28:1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Travelers Indemnity Company. (lw)
|
|
Filing 2
Initial Case Assignment to Judge Martin L.C. Feldman and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (ess)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, case number 2020-3706, B-5 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9003366) filed by Travelers Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Petition for Damages, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Andrea Leigh Albert added to party Travelers Indemnity Company(pty:dft).(Albert, Andrea) Modified text on 8/23/2021 (lw).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
