Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
Willis-Knighton Medical Center |
2:2021cv01774 |
September 27, 2021 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Dana Douglas |
Ivan LR Lemelle |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. § 12117 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CONSENT DECREE. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 10/18/2021.(pp) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Willis-Knighton Medical Center. (pp) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (aj) |
Filing 2 EXPARTE/CONSENT Joint MOTION for Entry of Consent Decree by Willis-Knighton Medical Center and by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Motion(s) referred to Dana Douglas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Consent Decree)(Kingsley, Andrew) Modified text on 10/15/2021 (pp). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Willis-Knighton Medical Center (Filed on behalf of USA - Filing Fee not required) filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Andrew Burke Kingsley added to party Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(pty:pla).(Kingsley, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.