Gray v. Beek et al
| Stephen Edward Gray |
| Capton Beek, Judge Rowen, Captain Beek and Judge Rowan |
| 2:2021cv01800 |
| September 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Ivan LR Lemelle |
| Michael North |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The party has sufficient funds to pay the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 10/19/2021. (jls)
|
| Filing 6 Letter to the Court from Stephen Edward Gray dated 10/14/2021. (jls) |
| Filing 5 Letter to the Court from Stephen Edward Gray dated 10/6/2021. (jls) |
| Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Stephen Edward Gray. Motion(s) referred to Michael North. (jls) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Captain Beek, Judge Rowan filed by Stephen Edward Gray. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jls) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Petition Pursuant to 28:2241. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 10/21/2021. (lw) |
| Filing 1 DEFICIENT: PETITION Pursuant to 28:2241 filed by Stephen Edward Gray. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
