Ernst v. Phillips 66 Company et al
Plaintiff: Charles Peter Ernst
Defendant: Phillips 66 Company and Phillips 66
Case Number: 2:2021cv01829
Filed: October 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Susie Morgan
Referring Judge: Michael North
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2021 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Phillips 66 on 11/22/2021, answer due 1/21/2022. (Daniel, Justine)
December 3, 2021 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Phillips 66 Company on 11/22/2021, answer due 1/21/2022. (Daniel, Justine)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DENYING #6 Motion to Withdraw Affidavit of Service. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff should file on the record a corrected executed summons once Phillips 66 has been served with the correct pleading or a waiver of service of the correct pleading. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 12/1/2021. (pp)
November 23, 2021 Filing 6 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Withdraw Document re #5 Summons Returned Executed by Charles Peter Ernst. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Daniel, Justine)
November 17, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Phillips 66 served on 11/5/2021, answer due 11/26/2021. (Daniel, Justine)
October 6, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Phillips 66, Phillips 66 Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(pp)
October 6, 2021 Filing 3 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. **Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of Summons. The pdf should not have the purple boxes nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action. No further action necessary.** (pp)
October 5, 2021 Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Susie Morgan and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (go)
October 5, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9052626) filed by Charles Peter Ernst. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request for Issuance of Summons to Phillips 66 Company, #3 Summons Request for Issuance of Summons to Phillips 66)Attorney Justine Geiger Daniel added to party Charles Peter Ernst(pty:pla).(Daniel, Justine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ernst v. Phillips 66 Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Peter Ernst
Represented By: Justine Geiger Daniel
Represented By: Casey Rose Denson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillips 66 Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillips 66
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?