Johnson v. Louisiana State et al
| Michael Terrell Johnson |
| Louisiana State |
| Attorney General State of Louisiana |
| 2:2021cv02197 |
| November 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Dana Douglas |
| Jay C Zainey |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by Michael Terrell Johnson. (bwn) |
Filing 3
ORDER - The record reflects that petitioner has neither paid the required filing fee nor submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner either pay the required filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis on or before January 28, 2022. If petitioner fails to comply with this Order, the undersigned will recommend that this civil action be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas on 1/7/22.(cg)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 12/21/2021. (sdp) |
| Filing 1 ***DEFICIENT*** PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Michael Terrell Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
