Davis v. Louisiana State
Plaintiff: Larry Davis
Defendant: Louisiana State
Case Number: 2:2021cv02270
Filed: December 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Greg Gerard Guidry
Referring Judge: Michael North
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Larry Davis. (bwn)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response as to #8 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff be given an additional 14 days, through February 8, 2022, to file an objection to the attached Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (R. Doc. 8). Signed by Judge Greg Gerard Guidry on 1/18/2022. (mm) (CC: via mail to Plaintiff)
January 18, 2022 Filing 11 Supplement by Larry Davis re #3 Complaint. (sdp)
January 13, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Response as to #8 Report and Recommendations by Larry Davis. (bwn)
January 11, 2022 Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #3 Complaint filed by Larry Davis: It is recommended that Plaintiff's claims against the State of Louisiana and the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Objections to R&R due by 1/25/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 1/11/2022.(jls)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAUPER ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with a partial payment of $17.22 and directing the remainder of filing fee be made from Prisoner Account as to Larry Davis in monthly payments as set out in document. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of summons until further order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 1/5/2022. (cc: Fin, Sheriff)(caa)
December 27, 2021 Filing 6 EXPARTE/CONSENT AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Larry Davis. Motion(s) referred to Michael North. (aj)
December 27, 2021 Filing 5 Supplement by Larry Davis to #3 Complaint. (aj)
December 13, 2021 Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Larry Davis. Motion(s) referred to Michael North. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(js)
December 13, 2021 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Larry Davis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(js)
December 10, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Complaint. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 12/31/2021. (js)
December 8, 2021 Filing 1 ***DEFICIENT*** COMPLAINT against Louisiana State filed by Larry Davis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(js)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Louisiana State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Louisiana State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?