Clark v. Santoke et al
| Torrance Clark |
| Seecharran Santoke, Sr. and Seecharran Santoke, Jr. |
| 2:2022cv00375 |
| February 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Donna Phillips Currault |
| Ivan LR Lemelle |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #9 Waiver of Service Executed.** Filing attorney entered incorrect date for the date waiver sent to party; waiver sent to Seecharran Santoke, Jr, and Seecharran Santoke,Sr. on 3/29/2022, answer due 05/31/2022. No further action is necessary.** (pp)
|
|
Filing 11
Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #10 Notice of Appearance.** Document has been stricken. Notice of Appearance is not the proper form to request representation of a party.** (pp)
|
|
Filing 10
**FILED IN ERROR**NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Lawrence Mullin on behalf of All Defendants. Attorney Michael Lawrence Mullin added to party Seecharran Santoke, Jr(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Lawrence Mullin added to party Seecharran Santoke, Sr(pty:dft).(Mullin, Michael) Modified on 3/30/2022 (pp).
|
|
Filing 9
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Seecharran Santoke, Jr on 3/29/2022, answer due 5/31/2022. Seecharran Santoke, Sr on 3/29/2022, answer due 5/31/2022.. (Mullin, Michael) Modified text on 3/30/2022 (pp).
|
|
Filing 8
Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #4 Civil Cover Sheet Submitted.** Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of Civil Cover Sheet. The pdf should not have the purple boxes nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action. No further action necessary.** (pp)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to Seecharran Santoke, Jr, Seecharran Santoke, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(pp)
|
|
Filing 6
Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #3 Request for Summons Issued.** Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of Summons. The pdf should not have the purple boxes nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action. No further action necessary.** (pp)
|
|
Filing 5
Initial Case Assignment to Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle and Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault. (ess)
|
|
Filing fee received from Connie Trieu : Receipt LAE071558 $402 (cc)
|
|
Filing 4
Civil Cover Sheet Submitted (Trieu, Connie) (Main Document 4 replaced on 2/17/2022) (pp).
|
|
Filing 3
Request of Summons Issued as to Seecharran Santoke, Sr filed by Torrance Clark re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Trieu, Connie) (Main Document 3 replaced on 2/17/2022) (pp). (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/17/2022) (pp).
|
|
Filing 2
Case Filing Fee Not Paid. The mandated filing fee of $402.00 has not been paid. If payment is not received within two business days, the matter will be referred to the assigned judge. (ess)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Credit Card not accepted or unavailable - payment of filing fee due within 2 business days) filed by Torrance Clark.Attorney Connie P. Trieu added to party Torrance Clark(pty:pla).(Trieu, Connie)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
