Marchese v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Denise Marchese
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation and Dow Chemical Company
Case Number: 2:2022cv00795
Filed: March 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Michael North
Referring Judge: Jay C Zainey
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Granting #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Stacy Foster for Dow Chemical Company and Union Carbide Corporation. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 5/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Visiting Attorneys) (ajn)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 EXPARTE/CONSENT Amended MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Stacy Foster (Fee previously paid) by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 SF - PHV Affidavit, #3 SF - CA Certificate of Good Standing, #4 SF - EDLA Consent to E-File)(Richards, Gretchen)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion filed by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (blg)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 5/10/2022. (blg)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File Memorandum in Further Support of Their Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Pleading)(Trapolin, Edward)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 **DEFICIENT** EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Stacy Foster (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-9349970) by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 PHV Affidavit, #3 Certificate of Good Standing, #4 EDLA Consent to Electronic Filing)(Richards, Gretchen) Modified on 5/10/2022 (ajn).
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Enroll as Additional Counsel of Record for Attorney Carlos Andre Benach and Gretchen F. Richards for Dow Chemical Company and Union Carbide Corporation. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 5/6/2022. (blg)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Enroll as Additional Counsel of Record Carlos A. Benach and Gretchen F. Richards by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Trapolin, Edward)
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by Denise Marchese re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Thornton, Jennifer)
April 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation. Motion(s) will be submitted on 5/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Notice of Submission)(Trapolin, Edward)
April 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Denise Marchese.(Barousse, William)
April 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing fee received from Coreyll Harrell:Receipt LAE 072306 $ 402 (cc)
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER AND REASONS granting Motion to Sever; This case shall be SEVERED into seven distinct civil actions. FURTHER ORDERED that, within ten days of the opening of the new civil actions, each plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in her respective case, confining the allegations therein to her respective claims. FURTHER ORDERED that, in each of the newly created cases, the respective plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of Court a filing fee of $402.00, at the time when the amended complaint is filed. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 3/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Case List Attachment, #2 Notice of Removal filed in CA 21-1067, #3 CA 21-1067 docket sheet)(lag)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marchese v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Marchese
Represented By: Richard P Voorhies, III
Represented By: Brandon Anthony Naquin
Represented By: Jennifer L. Thornton
Represented By: William Barousse
Represented By: William M. Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation
Represented By: Edward Winter Trapolin
Represented By: Timothy Farrow Daniels
Represented By: Carlos Andre Benach
Represented By: Gretchen F. Richards
Represented By: Stacy Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dow Chemical Company
Represented By: Timothy Farrow Daniels
Represented By: Edward Winter Trapolin
Represented By: Carlos Andre Benach
Represented By: Gretchen F. Richards
Represented By: Stacy Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?