Dickerson v. Bickham
Plaintiff: Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson
Defendant: Edward Dustin Bickham and Robin D. Pittman
Case Number: 2:2022cv01157
Filed: April 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Dana Douglas
Referring Judge: Wendy B Vitter
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2022 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #3 Complaint filed by Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's claims against Judge Robin D. Pittman in her official capacity be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's claims against Judge Pittman in her individual capacity be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous, for failing state a claim on which relief may be granted, and/or for seeking monetary damages against a defendant who is immune from such relief. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the claims against Warden Edward Dustin Bickham be severed and transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana. Objections to R&R due by 6/16/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas on 6/1/22.(cg)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PAUPER ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with a partial payment of $0.00 and directing the remainder of filing fee be made from Prisoner Account as to Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson in monthly payments as set out in document. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is DIRECTED to withhold issuance of summons until further order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas on 5/19/22.(cg)(cc:Financial and Warden)
May 16, 2022 Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson. Motion(s) referred to Dana Douglas. (js)
May 16, 2022 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(js)
April 29, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Complaint. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 5/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment) (bwn)
April 27, 2022 Filing 1 ***DEFICIENT*** COMPLAINT against Edward Dustin Bickham filed by Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(bwn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dickerson v. Bickham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Dustin Bickham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robin D. Pittman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?