Chisley, Jr. v. Norfolk Southern Corporation, et al
| Otis Chisley, Jr. and Otis L. Chisley, Jr. |
| Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
| 2:2022cv01266 |
| May 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Donna Phillips Currault |
| Wendy B Vitter |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of Civil Cover Sheet. The pdf should not have the pink header nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action. (cwa) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault. (cc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ALAEDC-9348579) filed by Otis L. Chisley, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney G. Karl Bernard added to party Otis L. Chisley, Jr.(pty:pla).(Bernard, G.) (Attachment 1 replaced on 5/10/2022) (cwa). Modified text on 5/10/2022 (cwa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
