Graham v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
| Kirk Graham |
| United Property & Casualty Insurance Company and United Property and Casualty Insurance Co. |
| 2:2022cv01363 |
| May 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Susie Morgan |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. IT IS ORDERED that Attorney Elise Barimo is admitted pro hac vice for Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 7/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Pro Hac Notice) (pp)
|
| Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Elise Barimo to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-9424773) by Kirk Graham. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Affidavit, #3 Certificate, #4 Proposed Order)(Emonet, Scott) Modified text on 7/1/2022 (pp). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United Property & Casualty Insurance Company. (pp) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Susie Morgan and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (go) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against United Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9359800) filed by Kirk Graham. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Scott M. Emonet added to party Kirk Graham(pty:pla).(Emonet, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
