Kurtz et al v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
United Property and Casualty Insurance Co. |
Matthew Kurtz, Megan Kurtz and United Property & Casualty Insurance Company |
2:2022cv01481 |
May 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Barry W Ashe |
Karen Wells Roby |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Hearing. Scheduling Conference set for 8/24/2022 01:30 PM before case manager by telephone. By Clerk. (clc) |
Filing 4 Directive of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by United Property & Casualty Insurance Company. By Clerk.(ko) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Barry W Ashe and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cc) |
Filing 2 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by United Property & Casualty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent United Insurance Holdings Corporation for United Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Matheny, Bette) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orleans Parish Civil District Court, case number 2022-02734 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9373746) filed by United Property & Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Bette R. Matheny added to party United Property & Casualty Insurance Company(pty:def).(Matheny, Bette) Modified on 5/27/2022 (ko). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.