Schneider et al v. United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
| Natalie Schneider |
| United Property and Casualty Insurance Co. |
| Neil Schneider |
| 2:2022cv01507 |
| May 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Jay C Zainey |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, by United Property and Casualty Insurance Co..(Hill, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by United Property and Casualty Insurance Co. identifying Corporate Parent United Insurance Holdings Corporation for United Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (Hill, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Compliance by United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.. (Hill, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jay C. Zainey and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (ess) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 24th Judicial District Court for Jefferson Parish, case number 826-899 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9376123) filed by United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Michael Edward Hill added to party United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.(pty:dft).(Hill, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
